4.3 Article

Bone and body composition analyses by DXA in adults with GH deficiency: effects of long-term replacement therapy

Journal

ENDOCRINE
Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages 666-675

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12020-021-02835-6

Keywords

Growth hormone deficiency; GH replacement therapy; Bone; Body composition

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that long-term rhGH replacement therapy has a positive effect on bone mass and body composition in AGHD patients, with males showing a more favorable outcome in response to treatment.
Purpose The effects of growth hormone (GH) replacement on bone mass and body composition in adult with GH deficiency (AGHD) are still debated with regard to their persistence in the long term. Moreover, the impact of the gender on the response to GH is controversial. Aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of rhGH replacement on bone mass and body composition in a monocentric cohort of patients with AGHD. Methods Data from 118 patients with AGHD (34.8 +/- 14.4 years, 43 women and 75 men) treated with rhGH for a period of at least 3 years up to a maximum of 10 were retrospectively collected. Bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, femur, and 1/3 radius, and total and truncular body composition were evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorption (DXA) before and during treatment. Clinical and laboratory evaluations were performed before and during the treatment period on an annual basis. Results Lumbar spine BMD consistently increased in males, while it decreased in females after a transient improvement observed during the first 4 years of therapy. There were no significant changes in femoral and 1/3 radial BMD in either sexes. Lean mass significantly increased in both sexes, while fat mass only decreased in males. Conclusions In AGHD patients long-term rhGH replacement therapy induces a positive effect with regard to bone mass and body composition. A sexual dimorphism in the response to treatment is evident, with males displaying a more favorable outcome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available