4.8 Article

Biogas upgrading through blends of deep eutectic solvents and monoethanol amine: 4 E analysis (energy, exergy, environmental, and economic)

Journal

GREEN CHEMISTRY
Volume 23, Issue 16, Pages 6076-6089

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1gc00714a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Technology Development Program to Solve Climate Changes through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT [NRF-2018M1A2A2026257]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government [NRF-2019M1A2A2065614]
  3. UNIST (Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology) [1.210103.01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study uses a blend of MEA and DES for biogas upgrading, demonstrating that adding MEA to ChCl/urea can significantly reduce energy consumption and improve solvent performance. The efficiency is highest at 15% MEA, while the 5% MEA case shows more potential in terms of environmental aspects. Economically, the 10% MEA case is more advantageous.
Blends of monoethanol amine (MEA) with an aqueous deep eutectic solvent (DES), with MEA present in various proportions of 5, 10, and 15 wt%, are used in process design for biogas upgrading. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that presents process analysis based on 4 major performance indicators, namely energy, exergy, environmental, and economic analysis, for biogas upgrading using a hybrid solvent. The process is modeled in Aspen Plus V10 commercial software. MEA and DES based configurations were considered as the base cases for the sake of performance comparison with the proposed configurations. Process evaluation determined that the addition of MEA to ChCl/urea not only reduces the amount of DES (>= 40%), but also improves the functionality of MEA itself together with overall solvent characteristics. As a result, the reduction in energy consumption in each proposed case is >= 72% compared to the MEA-based base case. While the process efficiency in terms of exergy destruction is the highest in the 15 wt% MEA case, the 5 wt% MEA case exhibits more potential in terms of environmental aspects. However, the economic factor is in favor of the 10 wt% MEA case with TAC savings of up to 27.8%. The overall process evaluation based on performance indicators revealed that the choice of hybrid solvent improves the efficiency of the process and the hybrid solvent has the potential to replace conventional solvents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available