4.7 Article

The projected background for the CUORE experiment

Journal

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C
Volume 77, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5080-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN)
  2. National Science Foundation [NSF-PHY-0605119, NSF-PHY-0500337, NSF-PHY-0855314, NSF-PHY-0902171, NSF-PHY-0969852, NSF-PHY-1307204, NSF-PHY-1314881, NSF-PHY-1401832, NSF-PHY-1404205]
  3. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  4. University of Wisconsin Foundation
  5. Yale University
  6. US Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science [DE-AC02-05CH11231, DE-AC52-07NA27344, DE-SC0012654]
  7. DOE Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics [DE-FG02-08ER41551, DE-FG03-00ER41138]
  8. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0012654] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Cryogenic Underground Observatory for Rare Events (CUORE) is designed to search for neutrinoless double beta decay of Te-130 with an array of 988 TeO2 bolometers operating at temperatures around 10 mK. The experiment is currently being commissioned in Hall A of Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, Italy. The goal of CUORE is to reach a 90% C.L. exclusion sensitivity on the Te-130 decay half-life of 9 x 10(25) years after 5 years of data taking. The main issue to be addressed to accomplish this aim is the rate of background events in the region of interest, which must not be higher than 10(-2) counts/keV/kg/year. We developed a detailed Monte Carlo simulation, based on results from a campaign of material screening, radioassays, and bolometric measurements, to evaluate the expected background. This was used over the years to guide the construction strategies of the experiment and we use it here to project a background model for CUORE. In this paper we report the results of our study and our expectations for the background rate in the energy region where the peak signature of neutrinoless double beta decay of Te-130 is expected.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available