4.0 Review

Computational Microfluidics for Geosciences

Journal

FRONTIERS IN WATER
Volume 3, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/frwa.2021.643714

Keywords

pore-scale analysis; microfluidics; computational fluid dynamics; reactive transport modeling; depth-averaged 2D model; porous media; multiphase flow

Funding

  1. CNRS
  2. UK EPSRC [EP/P031307/1]
  3. ALLIANCE
  4. French Agency for Research (Agence Nationale de la Recherche, ANR) through the Equipex Planex [ANR-11-EQPX-36]
  5. Labex Voltaire [ANR-10-LABX-100-01]
  6. grant CATCH [ANR-18-CE05-0035]
  7. FraMatI project [ANR-19-CE05-0002]
  8. EPSRC [EP/P031307/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Computational microfluidics for geosciences, as the third pillar of the scientific strategy, aims to decipher coupled processes in geological porous media by solving fundamental equations of continuum mechanics in exact porous materials geometry. Despite being in its early stages, recent progress in modeling multiphase flow and reactive transport at the pore-scale has provided new insights into the mechanisms occurring in geological porous media.
Computational microfluidics for geosciences is the third leg of the scientific strategy that includes microfluidic experiments and high-resolution imaging for deciphering coupled processes in geological porous media. This modeling approach solves the fundamental equations of continuum mechanics in the exact geometry of porous materials. Computational microfluidics intends to complement and augment laboratory experiments. Although the field is still in its infancy, the recent progress in modeling multiphase flow and reactive transport at the pore-scale has shed new light on the coupled mechanisms occurring in geological porous media already. In this paper, we review the state-of-the-art computational microfluidics for geosciences, the open challenges, and the future trends.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available