4.6 Article

Operation mechanism of organic electrochemical transistors as redox chemical transducers

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
Volume 9, Issue 36, Pages 12148-12158

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1tc02224e

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Organic mixed ionic electronic conductors (OMIECs) can be used as electrochemical redox sensors by controlling charge density through reactions with redox-active analytes. However, current sensors based on OECTs often do not meet the expected amplification performance.
The ability to control the charge density of organic mixed ionic electronic conductors (OMIECs) via reactions with redox-active analytes has enabled applications as electrochemical redox sensors. Their charge density-dependent conductivity can additionally be tuned via charge injection from electrodes, for instance in organic electrochemical transistors (OECTs), where volumetric charging of the OMIEC channel enables excellent transconductance and amplification of low potentials. Recent efforts have combined the chemical detection with the transistor function of OECTs to achieve compact electrochemical sensors. However, these sensors often fall short of the expected amplification performance of OECTs. Here, we investigate the operation mechanism of various OECT architectures to deduce the design principles required to achieve reliable chemical detection and signal amplification. By utilizing a non-polarizable gate electrode and conducting the chemical reaction in a compartment separate from the OECT, the recently developed Reaction Cell OECT achieves reliable modulation of the OECT channel's charge density. This work demonstrates that systematic and rational design of OECT chemical sensors requires understanding the electrochemical processes that result in changes in the potential (charge density) of the channel, the underlying phenomenon behind amplification.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available