4.2 Article

An empirical examination of open source software adoption in US public libraries

Journal

ELECTRONIC LIBRARY
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages 695-712

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/EL-01-2021-0013

Keywords

Public libraries; Open source software; Information technology adoption; Awareness; Attitude surveys

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined barriers and drivers to OSS adoption in US public libraries through an online survey, revealing that awareness is a key barrier for adoption. Practical implications were provided tailored for public libraries, emphasizing the importance of promoting OSS awareness in rural and town areas.
Purpose Similarly to Choi and Pruett (2019), which addressed open source software (OSS) adoption in the academic library context, this study aims to examine barriers and drivers to OSS adoption and to provide a snapshot of the current state of OSS adoption in US public libraries. Design/methodology/approach An online survey of the public library staff members who oversee information systems/technology in their library was conducted. A total number of 288 valid responses were used for data analysis. Findings A range of barriers and drivers to OSS adoption in US public libraries were revealed, but, unlike academic libraries, awareness was found to be a barrier. Additionally, the vast majority of the non-adopters showed very low levels of OSS adoption intent in the near future, more than that which was indicated by academic libraries. Practical implications Several practical implications tailored for public libraries are provided, such as promoting OSS awareness among public libraries in rural and town areas, the importance of the initial trial/adoption and funding and marketing towards public libraries with small service population sizes and so on. Originality/value Following Choi and Pruett (2019) which examined OSS adoption in the academic library context, this study conducted a similar online survey with US public libraries and made several contributions to the literature and to the public library field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available