4.7 Article

Unambiguous determination of crystal orientation in black phosphorus by angle-resolved polarized Raman spectroscopy

Journal

NANOSCALE HORIZONS
Volume 6, Issue 10, Pages 809-818

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1nh00220a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2020A1515010885]
  2. Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Program [JCYJ20190806142614541]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By conducting systematic ARPRS measurements, the degree of anisotropy in the response of black phosphorous evolves gradually and periodically with thickness, leading to intricate response. Crystal orientations of BP can be distinguished using Raman peak intensity ratio, where external anisotropic interference effect and intrinsic electron-phonon coupling play crucial roles in the observations.
Angle-resolved polarized Raman spectroscopy (ARPRS) is widely used to determine the crystal orientations of anisotropic layered materials (ALMs), which is an essential step to study all of their anisotropic properties. However, the understanding of the ARPRS response of black phosphorous (BP) as a most widely studied ALM is still unsatisfactory. Here, we clarify two key controversies about the physical origin of the intricate ARPRS response and the determination of crystal orientations in BP. Through systematic ARPRS measurements, we show that the degree of anisotropy of the response evolves gradually and periodically with the BP thickness, eventually leading to the intricate response. Meanwhile, we find that using the Raman peak intensity ratio of the two A(g) phonon modes, the crystal orientations of BP can be unambiguously distinguished via a concise inequality I-Ag2(AC)/I-Ag1(AC) > I-Ag2(ZZ) / I-Ag1(ZZ). Comprehensive analysis and first-principles calculations reveal that the external anisotropic interference effect and the intrinsic electron-phonon coupling are responsible for the observations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available