4.5 Article

In-beam γ-ray spectroscopy of 68Fe from charge exchange on 68Co projectiles

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
Volume 104, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.104.024313

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) [PHY-1565546, PHY-1913554]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics [DE-SC0020451, DE-FG02-97ER41041, DE-FG02-97ER41033]
  3. DOE National Nuclear Security Administration through the Nuclear Science and Security Consortium [DE-NA0003180]
  4. DOE, Office of Science
  5. DOE [DE-SC0019034]
  6. NSF [PHY-1811855]
  7. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0019034] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Excited states in the neutron-rich nucleus Fe-68 were populated via a charge-exchange reaction, showing promising prospects for future in-beam gamma-ray spectroscopy studies. The new gamma-ray transitions complement data from beta-decay studies and nucleon knockout reactions.
Excited states in the neutron-rich nucleus Fe-68 were populated using a Be-9(Co-68, Fe-68 +gamma)X charge-exchange reaction at 95 MeV/u. The new gamma-ray transitions reported here for the first time complement data from beta-decay studies and nucleon knockout reactions. In comparison to shell-model calculations with the LNPS effective interaction, two candidate states for the 6(1)(+) level emerge. The distinct population pattern of excited states and the magnitude of the cross section, sigma(inc) = 0.51( 6) mb, make this reaction a promising one for future in-beam gamma-ray spectroscopy. Reaction calculations with nuclear structure input from a new, locally optimized Hamiltonian, f7 j4 alpha, together with general considerations for heavy-ion-induced charge-exchange reactions appear consistent with most of the observations, although challenges remain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available