4.6 Article

Incorporating political-feasibility concerns into the assessment of India's clean-air policies

Journal

ONE EARTH
Volume 4, Issue 8, Pages 1163-1174

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.07.004

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Penn State School of International Affairs
  2. Korea University [K2009071]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Political feasibility is a crucial factor in air pollution policymaking, which often influences the implementation of clean-air policies. This study evaluates the political feasibility of various clean-air policies in India based on public opinion, market, and institutional considerations, and highlights the importance of considering varying degrees of political feasibility in achieving air-pollution and climate objectives simultaneously.
Political-feasibility concerns are at the center of real-world air-pollution policymaking. Yet, these concerns are often not represented in leading decision-support tools that have been used for assessing policies' environmental impacts. Focusing on a wide range of clean-air policies in India, we assess their political-feasibility scores on the basis of public opinion, market, and institutional considerations and then incorporate these scores into the evaluation of environmental impacts by using an integrated assessmentmodel (GAINS-South Asia). We demonstrate that although some policies with substantial potential to mitigate air pollution are also highly politically feasible (e.g., replacing solid fuels with cleaner fuels in households), others can be less politically feasible (e.g., banning agricultural waste burning). Because some clean-air policies co-reduce CO2 emissions and aerosols, considering varying degrees of political feasibility is particularly important in achieving air-pollution and climate objectives simultaneously because of its implications on the implementation scale and policy sequence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available