4.6 Article

Assessing global fisheries using Fisheries Performance Indicators: Introduction to special section

Journal

MARINE POLICY
Volume 125, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104253

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This section of Marine Policy focuses on the application of Fisheries Performance Indicators (FPIs) which aim to assess the overall status of fisheries worldwide, taking into account the pillars of ecology, community, and economics. Through global collaboration, researchers have conducted eight case studies to demonstrate the practical use of these indicators.
This special section of Marine Policy is devoted to applications of the Fisheries Performance Indicators (FPIs). The overall objective of these indicators is to provide a low cost, easily accessible and rapid assessment tool that measures an overall status of a particular fishery anywhere in the world where all three sustainability pillars; ecology, community, and economics are considered [2]. The eight case studies that follow this introduction are the result of a collaboration between researchers at the Institute for Sustainable Food Systems at the University of Florida, researchers and colleagues around the world and the Environment for Development (EfD) Global Hub at University of Gothenburg. EfD is a global network of environmental economics research centers aiming at effective management of the environment in the Global South. The rest of this introduction is organized in the following manner. The next section gives a brief introduction to FPIs, the third section provides a quick background to EfD, its Marine research program and how the FPIs were developed, Section 4 has an overview and some descriptive data from the 149 fisheries currently in the FPI data base, Section 5 gives an overview of the eight new case studies, and the last section concludes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available