4.7 Article

Agent-based neutral competition in two-community networks

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW E
Volume 104, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.104.024308

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Singapore Ministry of Education (MOE)
  2. Yale-NUS College [R-607-263-043-121]
  3. National Science Foundation of Hungary [HU NKFI FK K124438]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Competition between alternative states is crucial in both social and biological networks, and neutral competition can be represented by an unbiased random drift process. Real-world processes introduce three limiting factors that affect the direction and rate of spread. The effectiveness of a heterogeneous mean-field theory allows for quantitative predictions of consensus even without a complete reconstruction of network edges from empirical data.
Competition between alternative states is an essential process in social and biological networks. Neutral competition can be represented by an unbiased random drift process in which the states of vertices (e.g., opinions, genotypes, or species) in a network are updated by repeatedly selecting two connected vertices. One of these vertices copies the state of the selected neighbor. Such updates are repeated until all vertices are in the same consensus state. There is no unique rule for selecting the vertex pair to be updated. Real-world processes comprise three limiting factors that can influence the selected edge and the direction of spread: (1) the rate at which a vertex sends a state to its neighbors, (2) the rate at which a state is received by a neighbor, and (3) the rate at which a state can be exchanged through a connecting edge. We investigate how these three limitations influence neutral competition in networks with two communities generated by a stochastic block model. By using Monte Carlo simulations, we show how the community structure and update rule determine the states' success probabilities and the time until a consensus is reached. We present a heterogeneous mean-field theory that agrees well with the Monte Carlo simulations. The effectiveness of the heterogeneous mean-field theory implies that quantitative predictions about the consensus are possible even if empirical data (e.g., from ecological fieldwork or observations of social interactions) do not allow a complete reconstruction of all edges in the network.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available