3.8 Article

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF A MICRO HEAT EXCHANGER IN ELECTRONIC COOLING APPLICATIONS

Journal

JOURNAL OF THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages 773-790

Publisher

YILDIZ TECHNICAL UNIV
DOI: 10.18186/thermal.929458

Keywords

Cooling of Electronic Components; Micro Heat Exchangers; CFD

Categories

Funding

  1. Development Unit of Solar Equipments (UDES) of the EPST/Renewable Energy Development Center (CDER) of Algeria

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the application of single-phase liquid cooling systems for heat dissipation, showcasing the heat dissipation capability of a micro-heat exchanger. The results demonstrated that under specified temperature and power conditions, the cooling system could effectively lower the temperature of electronic components.
To operate under normal conditions and depending on the technology used, the electronic components must be at a temperature below 80 to 85 degrees C. Several cooling systems were investigated with the aim of improving the heat transfer process in this kind of applications. Single-phase liquid cooling systems, which mainly consist of a hot watercooled micro-heat exchanger, provide an efficient approach to dissipate heat flows. In the present study, numerical and experimental investigations were carried out to study the characteristics of laminar flow and forced convective heat transfer in micro-channels. The inlet temperature of cooling water ranged from 25 to 65 degrees C, the Reynolds number of water flow varied from 250 to 2000, and the electronic power supply component was set at 50, 80 and 120 W. The results showed that the micro heat exchanger was able to dissipate around 70 to 78% of the heat released by the electronic component. As regards the numerical results, it was observed that the inlet water temperature of 55 degrees C kept a heat source up to 80 W for a temperature source below the critical value of 80 degrees C.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available