3.8 Proceedings Paper

Injection Shilling Attack Tool for Recommender Systems

Publisher

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/CSICC52343.2021.9420553

Keywords

Recommender Systems; Attack Type; Collaborative Filter; Tool; Fake user; Shilling Attack

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recommender systems, such as the Collaborative Filtering Recommendation System, are popular but vulnerable to fake user attacks. It is crucial to detect and remove fake users to maintain accuracy in recommendations. Many algorithms have been developed to detect attackers, but researchers need to inject attack types into datasets and then evaluate their methods.
Recommender systems help people in finding a particular item based on their preference from a wide range of products in online shopping rapidly. One of the most popular models of recommendation systems is the Collaborative Filtering Recommendation System (CFRS) that recommend the top-K items to active user based on peer grouping user ratings. The implementation of CFRS is easy and it can easily be attacked by fake users and affect the recommendation. Fake users create a fake profile to attack the RS and change the output of it. Different attack types with different features and attacking methods exist in which decrease the accuracy. It is important to detect fake users, remove their rating from rating matrix and recognize the items has been attacked. In the recent years, many algorithms have been proposed to detect the attackers but first, researchers have to inject the attack type into their dataset and then evaluate their proposed approach. The purpose of this article is to develop a tool to inject the different attack types to datasets. Proposed tool constructs a new dataset containing the fake users therefore researchers can use it for evaluating their proposed attack detection methods. Researchers could choose the attack type and the size of attack with a user interface of our proposed tool easily.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available