4.7 Article

Risk aversion, informative noise trading, and long-lived information

Journal

ECONOMIC MODELLING
Volume 97, Issue -, Pages 247-254

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2021.02.001

Keywords

Informative noise trading; Risk aversion; Price efficiency

Categories

Funding

  1. Central University of Finance and Economics [023063022002/010]
  2. Program for Innovation Research in Central University of Finance and Economics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A dynamic strategic trading model was built to study the correlation between noise trading demand and asset fundamental value, which impacts the temporal properties of a perfect Bayesian equilibrium. The correlation coefficient influences how quickly prices incorporate private information. Market liquidity deteriorates if a large amount of private information cannot be revealed due to a negative correlation and the presence of only one risk-neutral insider. Efficiency issues caused by negatively correlated noise demand can be resolved by competitive insiders or risk-averse ones.
We build a dynamic strategic trading model in which noise trading demand may be correlated with an asset's fundamental value. This correlation shapes the temporal properties of a perfect Bayesian equilibrium. The more positive the correlation coefficient, the faster prices incorporate private information. In contrast, when the cor-relation is negative and only one risk-neutral insider exists, an abundant amount of private information cannot be revealed after the final trade, and market liquidity deteriorates over time. Moreover, information is revealed faster during earlier periods if positively correlated noise demand is concentrated early, whereas more infor-mation remains hidden after the final trade if negatively correlated noise demand is concentrated later. The inefficiency caused by negatively correlated noise demand can be resolved if insiders are competitive or risk averse.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available