4.1 Article

Monitoring the outbreak of equine glanders in Alagoas, Brazil: Clinical, immunological, molecular, and anatomopathological findings

Journal

CIENCIA RURAL
Volume 51, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

UNIV FEDERAL SANTA MARIA
DOI: 10.1590/0103-8478cr20200834

Keywords

Burkholderia mallei; diagnosis; Equidae; control; pathology

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated two glanders outbreaks in the state of Alagoas, Brazil, monitoring clinical symptoms in naturally infected animals and isolating the disease-causing bacteria. The research found no specific clinical patterns of glanders among animals infected with the same strain of Burkholderia mallei. Early diagnosis through sensitive immunoassays and comprehensive examinations were recommended for asymptomatic cases.
Glanders is an infectious and often lethal zoonotic disease of equines caused by the bacterium, Burkholderia mallei. This condition is characterized by respiratory, lymphatic, and cutaneous lesions. In this study, we monitored the development of clinical symptoms in animals naturally infected with B. mallei across different equine breeds and also isolated and characterized the disease-causing bacteria. We studied two official glanders outbreaks in the state of Alagoas, Brazil. During the outbreaks, we performed clinical and immunological follow-up of the animals, as well as euthanasia and anatomopathological examination. We also collected diagnostic materials for isolative, phenotypic, molecular, and biological testing. We did not observe any clinical patterns of glanders among animals infected with the same strain of B. mallei. Based on our results, we suggest that early diagnosis of infection should be made through highly sensitive and specific immunoassays. In asymptomatic but positive test cases, we confirmed the importance of conducting pathological, microbiological, and molecular examinations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available