3.8 Proceedings Paper

A review on recent advancement in materials for piezoelectric/triboelectric nanogenerators

Journal

MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS
Volume 46, Issue -, Pages 5523-5529

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.261

Keywords

Nanogenerators; Self-powered sensor; Nanomaterials; Piezoelectric; Triboelectric

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The concept of piezoelectric nanogenerators (PENGs) and triboelectric nanogenerators (TENGs) as sustainable, clean, reliable and cost-efficient power sources has made significant progress since their discovery in 2006 and 2012, with research focused on improving their performance for applications in IoT, wearable electronics and self-powered systems. The recent advancements in materials, output parameters and working modes of nanogenerators are reviewed, along with the basic procedures for synthesis, measurement and characterization.
The concept of piezoelectric nanogenerators (PENGs) and triboelectric nanogenerators (TENGs) as sustainable, clean, reliable and cost-efficient power sources has come a long way since their first discovery in 2006 and 2012 respectively. A significant amount of research has been conducted to improve the performance of nanogenerators for its successful implementation in Internet of Things, wearable electronics and self-powered systems. Here, this paper reviews the recent advancements in materials and their output parameters along with their specialties based on experimental and theoretical studies in the literatures. Basic working modes of the triboelectric nanogenerator are explained in detail and the general procedure to synthesize, measure and characterize a nanogenerator is introduced in a straightforward structure. (c) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Selection and peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the International Conference on Innovations in Clean Energy Technologies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available