4.2 Article

The effect of three different predatory ciliate species on activated sludge microfauna

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PROTISTOLOGY
Volume 58, Issue -, Pages 87-93

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejop.2017.01.001

Keywords

Biodiversity; Ciliate ecology; Food web; Predation

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Center [OPUS UMO-2013/09/B/NZ8/03303]
  2. Jagiellonian University Fund [DS/WBiNoS/INoS/758]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bacterivorous ciliates play important roles in the functioning of activated sludge by reducing dispersed bacteria and enhancing flocculation. There are, however, no data on the resistance of this functional group of microorganisms to predation. Our experiment was conducted with activated sludge subsamples subjected to artificially introduced three predatory ciliates species. The two predator species originating from activated sludge were Oxytricha sp. and Spathidium spathula. Dileptus margaritifer was a foreign predator species. The latter was introduced to compare its effect with the influence of predators naturally occurring in activated sludge on the ciliates community potentially adapted to certain predation strategies. Results showed that introduction of predatory ciliates into the activated sludge did not significantly change the total abundance of protozoa but rebuilt bacterivorous ciliate communities. Introduced predators significantly affected the most numerous ciliate species from the genera Epistylis and Cyclidium. In the presence of D. margaritifer, the abundance of sessile, colonial ciliates (Epistylis sp.) was significantly lower compared to the control treatment and to the treatments with the other predators. The activated sludge ciliate community was the most affected by the introduction of the foreign predator D. margaritifer, a large ciliate armed with toxicysts. (C) 2017 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available