4.6 Article

An Efficient Slime Mould Algorithm Combined With K-Nearest Neighbor for Medical Classification Tasks

Journal

IEEE ACCESS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages 113666-113682

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3105485

Keywords

Optimization; Feature extraction; Diseases; Medical diagnostic imaging; Signal processing algorithms; Particle swarm optimization; Machine learning algorithms; Medical classification; feature selection (FS); machine learning (ML); slime mould algorithm (SMA); opposition-based learning (OBL)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study introduces an improved version of the slime mould algorithm (ISMA) hybridized with opposition-based learning strategy based on the k-nearest neighbor (kNN) classifier for disease classification. The experiment results show the superiority of ISMA-kNN in various evaluation metrics compared to other algorithms.
Growing science and medical technologies have produced a massive amount of knowledge on different scales of biological systems. By processing various amounts of medical data, these technologies will increase the quality of disease detection and enhance the usability of health information systems. The integration of machine learning in computer-based diagnostic systems facilitates the early detection of diseases, enabling more productive treatments and prolonged survival rates. The slime mould algorithm (SMA) may have drawbacks, such as being trapped in minimal local regions and having an unbalanced exploitation and exploration phase. To overcome these limitations, this paper proposes ISMA, an improved version of the slime mould algorithm (SMA) hybridized with the opposition-based learning (OBL) strategy based on the k-nearest neighbor (kNN) classifier for the classification approach. Opposition-based learning improves global exploratory ability while avoiding premature convergence. The experimental results revealed the superiority of the proposed ISMA-kNN in various classification evaluation metrics, including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, F-score, G-mean, computational time, and feature selection (FS) size compared with the tunicate swarm algorithm (TSA), the marine predators algorithm (MPA), the chimp optimization algorithm (ChOA), the moth-flame optimization (MFO) algorithm, the whale optimization algorithm (WOA), the sine cosine algorithm (SCA), and the original SMA algorithm. Performance tests were run on the same maximum number of function evaluations (FEs) on nine UCI benchmark disease data sets with different feature sizes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available