Journal
ACS ES&T WATER
Volume 1, Issue 8, Pages 1807-1815Publisher
AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsestwater.1c00113
Keywords
willingness-to-pay; decision making; water reuse; end user; cooperative fee; rural Alaska
Categories
Funding
- Alaska Water and Sewer Challenge - ADEC
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
- National Science Foundation [1740075]
- Directorate For Engineering
- Div Of Electrical, Commun & Cyber Sys [1740075] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study examines community perceptions of water reuse and willingness to pay for in-home water reuse systems in two unserved rural Alaska communities. The survey results suggest that the cost of in-home water/sewer infrastructure may exceed what community members are willing or able to pay, with regional differences in acceptable costs and preferences for specific water fixtures.
Several rural communities in Alaska lack piped water and sewer services (unserved), leading to residents self-hauling drinking water and manually disposing of waste. Being time and labor intensive, these practices result in extremely low household water use and detrimental health impacts, leading to wash disease rates that are higher than those of communities with piped water and sewer systems. This study reports on results from community meetings and surveys held in two unserved rural Alaska communities to evaluate perceptions of water reuse and the willingness to pay for an in-home water reuse system to identify possible price points they are willing to accept. The survey was designed to iteratively understand which water fixtures households desired and at what cost. Survey results showed that in-home water/sewer infrastructure may cost more than community members are willing or able to pay. There are also regional differences in acceptable costs and preferences for specific water fixtures. The results also suggest myriad local factors that may impact acceptance, desire, and willingness to pay for in-home water reuse. Overall, this work highlights the importance of community input and engagement as well as assessment of community needs and readiness while developing technological solutions for rural communities in Alaska and beyond.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available