4.6 Article

Evaluation of a biphasic in vitro dissolution test for estimating the bioavailability of carbamazepine polymorphic forms

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES
Volume 105, Issue -, Pages 64-70

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2017.05.013

Keywords

Biphasic dissolution test; Polymorphic forms; In vitro-in vivo correlation; Discrimination; Carbamazepine

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council [201206050022]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purpose of this study was to discriminate three crystal forms of carbamazepine (a BCS II drug) by in vitro dissolution testing and to correlate in vitro data with published in vivo data. A biphasic dissolution system (phosphate buffer pH 6.8 and octanol) was used to evaluate the dissolution of the three polymorphic forms and to compare it with conventional single phase dissolution tests performed under sink and non-sink conditions. Similar dissolution profiles of three polymorphic forms were observed in the conventional dissolution test under sink conditions. Although a difference in dissolution was seen in the single phase dissolution test under non -sink conditions as well as in the aqueous phase of the biphasic test, little relevance for in vivo data was observed. In contrast, the biphasic dissolution system could discriminate between the different polymorphic forms in the octanol phase with a ranking of form III > form I > dihydrate form. This was in agreement with the in vivo performance. The dissolved drug available for oral absorption, which was dominated by dissolution and solution-mediated phase transformation, could be reflected in the biphasic dissolution test. Moreover, a good correlation was established between in vitro dissolution in the octanol phase of the biphasic test and in vivo pharmacokinetic data (R-2 = 0.99). The biphasic dissolution method is a valuable tool to discriminate between different crystal forms in the formulations of poorly soluble drugs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available