3.8 Review

Towards a generalized theory comprising digital, neuromorphic and unconventional computing

Journal

NEUROMORPHIC COMPUTING AND ENGINEERING
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/2634-4386/abf151

Keywords

neuromorphic computing; theory of computing; unconventional computing; non-digital hardware

Funding

  1. CogniGron research center (Univ. of Groningen)
  2. Ubbo Emmius Funds (Univ. of Groningen)
  3. EU H2020 project MeM-Scales [871371]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper investigates the relationships among digital, neuromorphic, unconventional, and possible future computing paradigms, highlighting that different choices of background mathematics lead to fundamentally different understandings of computing. Despite this diversity, a unified coordinate system for theorizing about computing can still be distilled.
The accelerating race of digital computing technologies seems to be steering towards impasses-technological, economical and environmental-a condition that has spurred research efforts in alternative, 'neuromorphic' (brain-like) computing technologies. Furthermore, for decades, the idea of exploiting nonlinear physical phenomena 'directly' for non-digital computing has been explored under names like 'unconventional computing', 'natural computing', 'physical computing', or 'in-materio computing'. In this article I investigate coordinates and conditions for a generalized concept of 'computing' which comprises digital, neuromorphic, unconventional and possible future 'computing' paradigms. The main contribution of this paper is an in-depth inspection of existing formal conceptualizations of 'computing' in discrete-symbolic, probabilistic and dynamical-systems oriented views. It turns out that different choices of background mathematics lead to decisively different understandings of what 'computing' is. However, across this diversity a unifying coordinate system for theorizing about 'computing' can be distilled.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available