Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Influence of Coronary Artery Diameter on Intracoronary Transluminal Attenuation Gradient During CT Angiography
Eun-Ah Park et al.
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING (2016)
Automated quantification of coronary plaque with computed tomography: comparison with intravascular ultrasound using a dedicated registration algorithm for fusion-based quantification
Mark J. Boogers et al.
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL (2012)
Quantification of coronary stenosis by dual source computed tomography in patients: A comparative study with intravascular ultrasound and invasive angiography
Gudrun Feuchtner et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY (2012)
Feasibility and limitation of coronary plaque volumetry by contrast-enhanced 64-row multi-detector computed tomography
Osamu Akutagawa et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY (2011)
Prospective Validation of Standardized, 3-Dimensional, Quantitative Coronary Computed Tomographic Plaque Measurements Using Radiofrequency Backscatter Intravascular Ultrasound as Reference Standard in Intermediate Coronary Arterial Lesions Results From the ATLANTA (Assessment of Tissue Characteristics, Lesion Morphology, and Hemodynamics by Angiography With Fractional Flow Reserve, Intravascular Ultrasound and Virtual Histology, and Noninvasive Computed Tomography in Atherosclerotic Plaques) I Study
Szilard Voros et al.
JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS (2011)
Automated Three-dimensional Quantification of Noncalcified Coronary Plaque from Coronary CT Angiography: Comparison with Intravascular US
Damini Dey et al.
RADIOLOGY (2010)
SCCT guidelines for performance of coronary computed tomographic angiography: A report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee
Suhny Abbara et al.
Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (2009)
Share Paper
