4.2 Article

Association of Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 Genotypes With Bladder Cancer Risk

Journal

IN VIVO
Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages 2535-2540

Publisher

INT INST ANTICANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12535

Keywords

Genotype; MMP1; polymorphism; bladder cancer; Taiwanese

Funding

  1. Taichung Armed Forces General Hospital [TCAFGH-D-109021]
  2. Asia University
  3. China Medical University Hospital [CMU109-ASIA-04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The results of the study suggest that MMP1 rs1799750 genotypes do not play a significant role in determining personal susceptibility to bladder cancer in Taiwanese individuals.
Aim: There is very little literature reporting the association of matrix metalloproteinase-1 (MMP1) with personal susceptibility to bladder cancer. In the current study, we carried out the first examination of the contribution of MMP1 rs1799750 to bladder cancer risk in Taiwanese. Materials and Methods: A total of 375 bladder cancer cases and 375 healthy controls were genotyped for MMP1 rs1799750 via polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism methodology and this was evaluated for association with clinicopathological factors. Results: The frequencies of MMP1 rs1799750 2G/2G, 1G/2G, and 1G/1G genotypes were 35.7%, 44.8% and 19.5% in the group with bladder cancer and 32.5%, 46.4%, and 21.1% in the healthy control group (p for trend=0.6362). The odds ratios (ORs) for bladder cancer risk after adjusting for age and gender for those carrying 1G/2G and 1G/1G genotypes at MMP1 rs1799750 were 0.88 (95% CI=0.62-1.24, p=0.4357) and 0.83 (95% CI=0.61-1.26, p=0.3990), respectively, compared with the wild-type 2G/2G genotype. In allelic frequency analysis, the adjusted OR for those carrying the 1G allele at MMP1 rs1799750 was 0.87 (95% CI=0.71-1.23, p=0.3479) compared to those people carrying a 2G allele. Conclusion: Our findings indicated that the genotypes at MMP1 rs1799750 appear to play little role in determining personal susceptibility to bladder cancer for Taiwanese.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available