4.5 Article

CFD-DEM Simulation of Fluidization of Polyhedral Particles in a Fluidized Bed

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 14, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en14164939

Keywords

CFD-DEM; polyhedron; fluidized bed; non-spherical particle; mixing

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [22078283]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigates the fluidization behavior of non-spherical polyhedral particles using a numerical CFD-DEM method. The results show that the CFD-DEM model with the polyhedron approach can accurately predict the behaviors of polyhedral particles, which exhibit stronger motion and higher mixing degree compared to spherical particles under the same fluidization gas velocity.
Fluidization of non-spherical particles is a common process in energy industries and chemical engineering. Understanding the fluidization of non-spherical particles is important to guide relevant processes. There already have been numerous studies which investigate the behaviors of different non-spherical particles during fluidization, but the investigations of the fluidization of polyhedral particles do not receive much attention. In this study, the investigation of the fluidization of polyhedral particles described by the polyhedron approach is conducted with a numerical CFD-DEM method. Experiments of the fluidization of three kinds of polyhedral particles are conducted under the same condition with corresponding simulations to validate the accuracy of our CFD-DEM model. The results indicate that our CFD-DEM model with the polyhedron approach can predict the behaviors of polyhedral particles with reasonable accuracy. Fluidization behaviors of different polyhedral particles are also investigated in this study. Compared to spherical particles, the motion of polyhedral particles is stronger, and mixing degree is higher under the same fluidization gas velocity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available