4.7 Article

A Machine Learning Model for Photorespiration Response to Multi-Factors

Journal

HORTICULTURAE
Volume 7, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae7080207

Keywords

photorespiration; environment; model; machine learning

Categories

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFD1001902]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study established a machine learning model for the response of cucumber leaf photorespiration rate to multiple factors, with the XGBoost model showing the best fit performance. Results indicate high accuracy and generalization ability of the model, providing a theoretical basis for photorespiration studies.
Photorespiration results in a large amount of leaf photosynthesis consumption. However, there are few studies on the response of photorespiration to multi-factors. In this study, a machine learning model for the photorespiration rate of cucumber leaves' response to multi-factors was established. It provides a theoretical basis for studies related to photorespiration. Machine learning models of different methods were designed and compared. The photorespiration rate was expressed as the difference between the photosynthetic rate at 2% O-2 and 21% O-2 concentrations. The results show that the XGBoost models had the best fit performance with an explained variance score of 0.970 for both photosynthetic rate datasets measured using air and 2% O-2, with mean absolute errors of 0.327 and 0.181, root mean square errors of 1.607 and 1.469, respectively, and coefficients of determination of 0.970 for both. In addition, this study indicates the importance of the features of temperature, humidity and the physiological status of the leaves for predicted results of photorespiration. The model established in this study performed well, with high accuracy and generalization ability. As a preferable exploration of the research on photorespiration rate simulation, it has theoretical significance and application prospects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available