4.6 Article

Historical GIS as a Tool for Monitoring, Preserving and Planning Forest Landscape: A Case Study in a Mediterranean Region

Journal

LAND
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/land10080851

Keywords

GIS; FoSS; historical cartography; thematic map classification; Mediterranean forest; Basilicata region; Southern Italy; forest landscape

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To assess forest dynamics and management strategies, monitoring systems based on qualitative and quantitative tools are necessary. By utilizing historical GIS and evolving spatial analysis tools, a case study in the Mediterranean region showed how a diachronic analysis was used to evaluate forest landscape dynamics.
In order to assess the dynamics of forests and the effectiveness of their management strategies, it is necessary to develop monitoring systems based on qualitative and quantitative tools for their conservation, valorization and restoration. This approach is particularly important for areas that have undergone intense anthropogenic transformations in the last century. In order to do this, it is first necessary to apply a chronological methodology based on historical GIS that allows the integration of different types of geodata. As a result of constantly evolving spatial analysis tools, the monitoring of landscape forest evolution is increasingly more effective and complete. Using as a case study a region representative of common processes of other Mediterranean areas (Southern Italy-Basilicata region), a diachronic analysis of 156 years was applied to evaluate the forest landscape dynamics. Starting from historical cartographies to remotely sensed data available online, a GIS-based approach was implemented to evaluate the spatial and statistical variations of the forest landscape. In this way, it was possible to assess how much, where and how the forest landscape has changed in order to provide a methodology to support more detailed and sectoral studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available