4.6 Article

Landscape Ecological Analysis of Green Network in Urban Area Using Circuit Theory and Least-Cost Path

Journal

LAND
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/land10080847

Keywords

linkage mapper; centrality; pinch-point; barrier; connectivity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study utilizes circuit theory and least-cost path methods to present an objectified and applicable green network for spatial planning. Analysis of the Least-cost Path revealed 69 least-cost paths passing through small green areas and streams in the city. Circuit theory was used to distinguish areas and assess the effectiveness of the green network.
Quantitative securing of green space in already developed cities has many practical limitations due to socio-economic limitations. Currently, South Korea is planning a green network to secure and inject effective green space, but it is difficult to reflect it in the actual space plan due to the abstract plan. This study utilizes circuit theory and least-cost path methods for presenting a green network that is objectified and applicable to spatial planning. First, an analysis of the Least-cost Path revealed 69 least-cost paths between 43 core green areas of the study site. Most least-cost paths have been identified as passing through small green areas and streams in the city. Using the circuit theory, it was also possible to distinguish areas other than least-cost paths from areas with high potential for development, areas where target species are concentrated within corridors. In particular, areas with relatively high green network improvement effects were derived within and around corridors. This study is most significant in establishing and evaluating existing urban green networks, overcoming the limitations discussed at the linear level and expanding to the area level. To increase the utilization of this study in the future, field surveys and monitoring studies on target species need to be supplemented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available