4.7 Article

Moderating role of institutional quality in validation of pollution haven hypothesis in BRICS: a new evidence by using DCCE approach

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/511356-021-16087-4

Keywords

Ecological footprint; Foreign direct investment; Institutional quality; DCCE approach

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that foreign direct investment is a source of pollution haven in the BRICS region, with the moderating effect of institutional quality on FDI for ecological footprint being negative. Additionally, it identified the threshold point where the FDI effect becomes negative on ecological footprint.
The technological innovation and strict environmental protocols in the highly developed regions have become the primary sources for foreign direct investment to move in the pollution haven economies. In this regard, this study attempted to identify the role of foreign direct investment (FDI) in the developing economies of the Brazil. Russia, India. China, and South Africa (BRICS) region. For this reason, a darnset was obtained between 1995 and 2019. Chudik and Pesaran's (2015) latest dynamic common correlated effects (DCCE) technique is used because of its new features when integrating the problems of heterogeneity and structural breaks into panel data that are general and do not encompass much recent research in this context. According to the empirical outcomes, foreign direct investment is a source of pollution haven in this region. However, the moderating effect of institutional quality on foreign direct investment has been found negative for ecological footprint. It also found the threshold point where the foreign direct investment effect becomes negative on ecological footprint. Based on these empirical results, this research suggests that foreign direct investment strategy should be maintained in the presence of good institutional efficiency as it enhances the environment and promotes economic development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available