4.6 Article

Quantum Monte Carlo studies of a trimer scaling function with microscopic two- and three-body interactions

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW A
Volume 104, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.104.033301

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2018/09191-7, 2017/05660-0, 2019/00153-8]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico [308486/2015-3, 304469-2019-0, 303579/2019-6]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Nuclear Physics [DE-AC52-06NA25396]
  4. DOE NUCLEI SciDAC Program
  5. LANL LDRD Program
  6. DOE Early Career Research Program
  7. National Science Foundation [ACI1548562]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Researchers proposed an energy scaling function to predict the energy of bosonic trimers, validated by quantum Monte Carlo calculations. Depending on scattering length, effective range, and a reference energy, this scaling function can probe Efimov physics.
We present an energy scaling function to predict, in a specific range, the energy of bosonic trimers with large scattering lengths and finite range interactions, which is validated by quantum Monte Carlo calculations using microscopic Hamiltonians with two- and three-body potentials. The proposed scaling function depends on the scattering length, effective range, and a reference energy, which we chose as the trimer energy at unitarity. We obtained the scaling function as a limit cycle from the solution of the renormalized zero-range model with effective range corrections. We proposed a simple parametrization of the energy scaling function. Besides the intrinsic interest in theoretical and experimental investigations, this scaling function allows one to probe Efimov physics with only the trimer ground states, which may open opportunities to identify Efimov trimers whenever access to excited states is limited.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available