4.7 Article

Shannon information criterion for low-high diversity transition in Moran and voter models

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW E
Volume 104, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.104.024315

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CNPq [301082/2019-7, 132438/2017-8]
  2. FAPESP [2016/01343-7, 2019/20271-5, 2020/13957-5]
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior-Brasil (CAPES) [001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mutation and drift have opposite roles in genetics, with mutation creating diversity and drift causing gene variants to disappear. In the absence of natural selection and migration, the balance between drift and mutation in a well-mixed population determines its diversity.
Mutation and drift play opposite roles in genetics. While mutation creates diversity, drift can cause gene variants to disappear, especially when they are rare. In the absence of natural selection and migration, the balance between the drift and mutation in a well-mixed population defines its diversity. The Moran model captures the effects of these two evolutionary forces and has a counterpart in social dynamics, known as the voter model with external opinion influencers. Two extreme outcomes of the voter model dynamics are consensus and coexistence of opinions, which correspond to low and high diversity in the Moran model. Here we use a Shannon's information-theoretic approach to characterize the smooth transition between the states of consensus and coexistence of opinions in the voter model. Mapping the Moran into the voter model, we extend the results to the mutation-drift balance and characterize the transition between low and high diversity in finite populations. Describing the population as a network of connected individuals, we show that the transition between the two regimes depends on the network topology of the population and on the possible asymmetries in the mutation rates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available