4.4 Review

Understanding multifunctional Bay of Fundy dykelands and tidal wetlands using ecosystem services-a baseline

Journal

FACETS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages 1446-1473

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/facets-2020-0073

Keywords

Tidal wetland restoration; dike realignment; ecosystem service; managed realignment; salt marsh; trade-offs

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [NSERC NETGP 523374-18]
  2. Canadian Department of Fisheries and Oceans Coastal Restoration Fund
  3. Agriculture and Agri-food Canada
  4. Nova Scotia Graduate Scholarship
  5. National Science Foundation Earth Science Postdoctoral Fellowship [1952627]
  6. Cette recherche a ete financee par le Conseil de recherches en sciences naturelles et en genie du Canada (CRSNG) [CRSNG NETGP 523374-18]
  7. Division Of Earth Sciences
  8. Directorate For Geosciences [1952627] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Agricultural dykelands and tidal wetlands in the Bay of Fundy provide different ecosystem services, with complex dynamics and gaps in knowledge about service delivery and dynamics. It is important to be open to adapting ecosystem service concepts and categorizations to fully understand the Indigenous implications of these land use decisions.
We review what is known about ecosystem service (ES) delivery from agricultural dykelands and tidal wetlands around the dynamic Bay of Fundy in the face of climate change and sea-level rise, at the outset of the national NSERC ResNet project. Agricultural dykelands are areas of drained tidal wetland that have been converted to agricultural lands and protected using dykes and aboiteaux (one-way drains or sluices), first introduced by early French settlers (Acadians). Today, Nova Scotia's 242 km system of dykes protect 17,364 ha of increasingly diverse land uses-including residential, industrial, and commercial uses as well as significant tourism, recreational, and cultural amenities-and is undergoing system modernization and adaptation. Different ES are provided by drained and undrained landscapes such as agriculture from dykelands and regulating services from wetlands, but more complex dynamics exist when beneficiaries are differentiated. This review reveals many knowledge gaps about ES delivery and dynamics, including around net greenhouse gas implications, storm protection, water quality, fish stocks, pollination processes, sense of place, and aesthetics, some of which may reveal shared ES or synergies instead of trade-offs. We emphasize the need to be open to adapting ES concepts and categorizations to fully understand Indigenous implications of these land use decisions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available