3.8 Article

Nickel oxide nanoparticles induced DNA damages in human liver cells

Journal

ISTANBUL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY
Volume 51, Issue 2, Pages 175-182

Publisher

ISTANBUL UNIV, FAC PHARMACY
DOI: 10.26650/IstanbulJPharm.2021.837856

Keywords

Nickel oxide; Nanoparticles; Genotoxicity; Oxidative stress; Apoptosis

Funding

  1. Research Fund of Istanbul University [37785]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that NiO-NPs caused morphological changes in cells, leading to cell death mainly through apoptosis. Genotoxicity and oxidative damage were observed to be dose-dependent.
Background and Aims: Nickel oxide nanoparticles (NiO-NPs) are one of the most used nanoparticles, especially as photosensitizers. Although some studies evaluate their toxicity in the liver, the information about their toxicity at the cellular and molecular levels is still controversial. In the present study, it was aimed to investigate the in vitro toxic potentials of NiO-NPs (average size 15.0 nm) in the liver (HepG2) cell Line. Methods: NiO-NPs were characterized by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), the cellular uptake of NPs and the morphologic changes were evaluated by TEM and Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS), the cytotoxicity was evaluated by MTT and neutral red uptake (NRU) tests, comet assay was used for genotoxicity, Annexin V-FITC/propidium iodide (PI) apoptosis detection kit was used for apoptosis/ necrosis evaluation and Enzyme-Linked Immune Sorbent Assays (ELISA) kits were used for the potential of oxidative damage. Results: Our results showed that cellular uptake of NiO-NPs led to morphological changes in the cells, and caused cell death (1050 was 146.7 mu g/mL by MTT) mainly by apoptosis. Genotoxicity and oxidative damage were observed to be in a dosedependent manner. Conclusion: Results confirm previous data and draw attention to the toxic effects of NiO-NPs; further in vivo and in vitro studies need to be done to clarify the safety or toxicity of NiO-NPs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available