4.5 Article

Methanol fuel production from solar-assisted supercritical water gasification of algae: a techno-economic annual optimisation

Journal

SUSTAINABLE ENERGY & FUELS
Volume 5, Issue 19, Pages 4913-4931

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1se00394a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Government, through the Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research on methanol synthesis through solar-thermal supercritical water gasification (SCWG) shows that steam methane reforming (SMR) with CO2 dumping can achieve a lower production cost, but the lowest-cost reforming option may change if the cost of renewable H-2 decreases.
Methanol synthesis offers a relatively fast transient response compared to other fuel synthesis technologies-a promising downstream alternative for solar-derived syngas. However, many non-intuitive design choices must be analysed to achieve an optimal techno-economic performance of this technology in the presence of variable solar energy. Using a combination of steady-state Aspen flowsheeting, dynamic simulation and techno-economic optimisation, this work presents the techno-economic performance of methanol production through solar-thermal supercritical water gasification (SCWG) of algae with three alternative methane reforming options. The syngas is conditioned for downstream use through either CO2 dumping or H-2 addition. In a multi-objective optimisation, solar multiple and storage capacity are varied to minimise the levelised cost of fuel (LCOF) and maximise the capacity factor of the system. Results indicate that steam methane reforming (SMR) with CO2 dumping gives a minimum LCOF of similar to 1.6 AUD per L. The lowest-cost reforming option changes if the cost of renewable H-2 drops. Achieving high capacity factor (>98%) configurations requires large storage and causes LCOF to increase 4-5x. Scaling up the solar-thermal collector to 700 MWth yields LCOF reductions of similar to 20% relative to the baseline 50 MWth scale, beyond which optical losses outweigh scaling benefits. Overall, the choice of methanol for downstream fuel synthesis appears to be beneficial due to its faster ramping and overall increased output compared to Fischer-Tropsch synthesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available