4.7 Article

The NICE Evidence Standards Framework for digital health and care technologies - Developing and maintaining an innovative evidence framework with global impact

Journal

DIGITAL HEALTH
Volume 7, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/20552076211018617

Keywords

Health economics; health technology assessment; digital health; general; clinical evidence

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ESF is a standardized framework developed in 2018 by NICE in partnership with various UK health organizations to guide developers and commissioners on the evidence levels required for evaluating DHTs. The framework has been well-received and has had a significant impact globally, with ongoing efforts to maintain and improve it in a rapidly evolving field.
Objective In 2018, the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), in partnership with Public Health England, NHS England, NHS Improvement and others, developed an evidence standards framework (ESF) for digital health and care technologies (DHTs). The ESF was designed to provide a standardised approach to guide developers and commissioners on the levels of evidence needed for the clinical and economic evaluation of DHTs by health and care systems. Methods The framework was developed using an agile and iterative methodology that included a literature review of existing initiatives and comparison of these against the requirements set by NHS England; iterative consultation with stakeholders through an expert working group and workshops; and questionnaire-based stakeholder input on a publicly available draft document. Results The evidence standards framework has been well-received and to date the ESF has been viewed online over 55,000 times and downloaded over 19,000 times. Conclusions In April 2021 we published an update to the ESF. Here, we summarise the process through which the ESF was developed, reflect on its global impact to date, and describe NICE's ongoing work to maintain and improve the framework in the context for a fast moving, innovative field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available