4.7 Article

Manganese and iron PCP pincer complexes - the influence of sterics on structure and reactivity

Journal

DALTON TRANSACTIONS
Volume 50, Issue 39, Pages 13915-13924

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1dt02407h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P32570-N]
  2. FundacAo para a Ciencia e Tecnologia [UIDB/00100/2020]
  3. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P32570] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The synthesis of various manganese and iron PCP pincer complexes via solvothermal oxidative addition was described. The reaction with sterically demanding ligands exhibited significant differences in reactivity, leading to the formation of Fe(i) complexes. X-ray structures of representative complexes were provided for analysis.
The syntheses of various manganese and iron PCP pincer complexes via a solvothermal oxidative addition methodology is described. Upon reacting [Mn-2(CO)(10)] with the ligands (P(C-Br)P-CH2-iPr) (1a) and (P(C-Br)P-O-iPr) (1b), Mn(i) PCP pincer complexes [Mn(PCPCH2-iPr)(CO)(3)] (2a) and [Mn(-PCPO-iPr)(CO)(3)] (2b) were obtained. Protonation of 2a with HBF4 center dot Et2O led to the formation of [Mn(kappa P-3,CH,P-P(CH)P-CH2-iPr)(CO)(3)]BF4 (3) featuring an eta(2)-C-aryl-H agostic bond. The solvothermal reaction of 1a with [Fe-2(CO)(9)] afforded the Fe(ii) PCP pincer complex [Fe(PCPCH2-iPr)(CO)(2)Br] (4). Treatment of 4 with Li[HBEt3] afforded the Fe(i) complex [Fe(PCPCH2-iPr)(CO)(2)] (5a). When using the sterically more demanding ligands (P(C-Br)P-CH2-tBu) (1c) and (P(C-Br)P-O-tBu)(1d) striking differences in reactivity were observed. While neither 1c nor 1d showed any reactivity towards [Mn-2(CO)(10)], the reaction with [Fe-2(CO)(9)] and [Fe(CO)(5)] led to the formation of the Fe(i) complexes [Fe(PCPCH2-tBu)(CO)(2)] (5b) and [Fe(PCPO-tBu)(CO)(2)] (5c). X-ray structures of representative complexes are provided.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available