Journal
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION FORENSICS AND SECURITY
Volume 16, Issue -, Pages 4246-4248Publisher
IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIFS.2021.3101043
Keywords
Forgery; Encryption; Research and development; Public key cryptography; Forensics; Message authentication; Mathematics; Cryptoanalysis; path validation; proof forgery
Funding
- National Nature Science Foundation of China [61872060, 62002050]
- Key Research and Development Program of Sichuan [2021YFG0158]
- National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB0802000]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The research reveals that the path validation scheme with constant-size proof is not unforgeable, as adversaries can forge valid proofs with a significant probability.
We analyze a path validation scheme with constant-size proof (published in IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security) and demonstrate that this scheme fails to achieve unforgeability. An adversary can forge a valid proof with a non-negligible probability.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available
Share Paper
