4.8 Article

Site-directed reduction engineering within bimetal-organic frameworks for efficient size-selective catalysis

Journal

MATTER
Volume 4, Issue 9, Pages 2919-2935

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.matt.2021.06.038

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22072163, 21761132010, 91645114]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province of China [2020-YQ-02]
  3. Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Supramolecular Structure and Materials [sklssm 202104]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Directional reduction processing of MOFs has enabled the customization of hierarchical MOFs/metal nanoparticle composites with different structures, exhibiting unique size-selective catalytic properties.
Directional processing of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) into unique hybrid materials with desired structures and properties is a key scientific challenge in exploring the enhanced functionality and potential applications of MOF compounds. Here, the reducibility of MOF clusters is first revealed via theoretical calculations from the viewpoint of the reduction potential energy (E-reduction), which serves as the basic principle for the site-directed reduction processing of MOFs. During this process, the active component with a high (E-reduction) in bimetallic MOFs is selectively reduced to metal nanostructures, while the other (inert) parts maintain their structural integrity. A series of hierarchical MOFs/metal nanoparticle composites with different structures, including yolk-shell, core-shell, and dispersed, have been successfully customized. More importantly, the as-prepared hybrid materials (Co-B@ZIF-8) exhibit unique size-selective properties in catalyzing ketone hydrogenation, which originate from the combination of the high catalytic performance of the nanoscale metal catalysts and the molecular sieving behavior of the MOFs' well-defined microporous nature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available