4.4 Article

Construct validation of an innovative observational child assessment system: Teaching Strategies GOLD® birth through third grade edition

Journal

EARLY CHILDHOOD RESEARCH QUARTERLY
Volume 56, Issue -, Pages 41-51

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2021.02.005

Keywords

Teaching Strategies GOLD (R); Validity evidence of internal structure; Reliabilitya

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the validity evidence and reliability estimates of Teaching Strategies GOLD (R) Birth through Third Grade (GOLD (R) B-3rd). The results showed that GOLD (R) B-3rd is a psychometrically adequate measure of developmental progress in various domains for young children. More research is encouraged for further validation evidence of this assessment scale.
Teaching Strategies GOLD (R) child assessment system has been frequently adopted in state-funded early childhood policy initiatives, but there is little validation research about its newest edition, GOLD (R) Birth through Third Grade (GOLD (R) B-3rd). Based on a sample of children aged from birth through pre-kindergarten, this study investigated validity evidence regarding internal structure of this observational assessment, and the reliability estimates for each learning domain. From the results of confirmatory factor analysis, acceptable fit of the proposed measurement structure and high composite reliability estimates for the learning domains were found. We found evidence that the GOLD (R) B-3rd is a psychometrically adequate measure (to the extent of its internal structure) of developmental progress in social-emotional, physical, language, cognitive, literacy, and mathematics domains for young children. Findings of this research add to the body of validation research of GOLD (R) B-3rd, and encourage future investigations on other types of validity evidence for this scale. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available