4.3 Article

Removal of Hg(II) ions with CD/DVD waste-derived aminated polycarbonate: adsorption and optimization studies

Journal

DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT
Volume 231, Issue -, Pages 229-243

Publisher

DESALINATION PUBL
DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2021.27477

Keywords

E-waste; Experimental design; Mercury; Plastic; Water treatment

Funding

  1. Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (Fundamental Research Grant Scheme) [FP074-2018A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrated that waste-derived aminated polycarbonate could serve as a potential adsorbent for mercury treatment in contaminated water, showing high efficiency in mercury removal.
A massive quantity of plastic waste is generated daily, leading to serious environmental issues. As one of the plastic wastes, the waste optical discs contain polycarbonates that can be recovered and utilized as value-added materials. In this work, polycarbonate was recovered from waste discs and aminated. The adsorption of aqueous Hg(II) ions onto the aminated PC was investigated, where the experimental variables were evaluated with a Box-Behnken design. The response surface model revealed that 1 mg L-1 of initial Hg(II) ions concentration, pH 7, and 10 min contact time as the optimal settings for mercury removal. According to the validation study on spiked samples, the mercury removal efficiency was ranged from 97% to 99%, which is consistent with the model prediction and considerably independent from the effect of sample matrices under the experimental conditions of this work. Regarding the best fitting among the investigated adsorption models, the adsorption process is well-described by the Freundlich isotherm, which indicated monolayer adsorption. The adsorption process was also found to follow the pseudo-second-order kinetic model that described the chemisorption. The result of this study suggested that the waste-derived aminated polycarbonate could be a potential adsorbent for the treatment of mercury in contaminated water.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available