4.1 Article

Diabetic macular edema outcomes in eyes treated with fluocinolone acetonide 0.2 μg/d intravitreal implant: real-world UK experience

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 357-362

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.5301/ejo.5000929

Keywords

Diabetic macular edema; Fluocinolone acetonide; Iluvien (R)

Categories

Funding

  1. Alimera Sciences Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To conduct an observational, multicenter study to evaluate real-world clinical efficacy and safety of the 0.2 mu g/day fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implant in the treatment of patients with chronic diabetic macular edema (DME) in 3 large hospital ophthalmology departments in the United Kingdom. Methods: Fluocinolone acetonide implants were inserted into the study eyes following a suitable washout period; phakic eyes received FAc implant following cataract surgery. Follow-up visits took place 2-4 weeks postinjection and then at 3, 6, and 12 months; change in central macular thickness (CMT) from baseline was measured by optical coherence tomography and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was also assessed. Adverse events and changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) were recorded in order to evaluate the safety profile for the FAc implant. Results: Improvements in BCVA and CMT were observed from 3 months and sustained for the duration of observation. At 12 months, the overall mean change from baseline CMT was -126 mu m and mean increase in BCVA from baseline was 5.1 letters. Increases in IOP following FAc implant were easily managed with IOP-lowering medication. Implant migration into the anterior chamber occurred in 2 eyes where prior vitrectomy had resulted in a posterior capsule defect; this was rectified and resolved. Conclusions: The results of this study provide further efficacy and safety profile data for FAc implant treatment of chronic DME in a real-world clinical setting; the FAc implant appears to be a valuable therapeutic approach for patients with chronic DME who have suboptimal response to other treatment options.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available