4.2 Article

Operculum PIT tagging: a viable alternative to avoid human consumption in processed salmon

Journal

ANIMAL BIOTELEMETRY
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1186/s40317-021-00261-z

Keywords

Passive integrated transponder; Intraperitoneal; Salmo salar; Tag effects; Aquaculture; Fish; Welfare

Funding

  1. Norwegian Ministry of Trade, Industry and Fisheries through Institute of Marine Research Project [14597, 14930]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study compared the effects of tagging PIT tags in the operculum musculature or the abdominal cavity in Atlantic salmon post-smolts. The results showed that there was no significant difference in mortality rate and tag loss between fish tagged in the operculum musculature and the abdominal cavity, suggesting that placing PIT tags in the operculum musculature is a viable alternative.
Background Passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags are commonly used to identify individual fish. However, use of PIT tags in commercial aquaculture research is limited by consumer safety concerns. For farmed fish, it is critical that tags do not end up in the final product. One possibility to enable the use of PIT tags in commercial research is to insert tags into a part of the body that will be separated from the trunk during processing. We compare tag loss, mortality rate and welfare scores between Atlantic salmon post-smolts (n = 798) marked with PIT tags either in the operculum musculature or the abdominal cavity (standard practice) before and after mechanical delousing. Results We found that neither condition factor (K) (range 0.60-1.99) nor tagging location significantly affected tag loss (operculum = 6%, intraperitoneal = 8%, z = 1.46, p = 0.14) or mortality (operculum = 2%, intraperitoneal = 2%, z = 0.55, p = 0.58). However, on average, the fish which died weighed 20% less at the time of handling (271 +/- 13 g, K = 1.12 +/- 0.02) than those which survived (340 +/- 3 g, K = 1.14 +/- 0.004), and those which lost tags (291 +/- 7 g, K = 1.11 +/- 0.02) weighed 15% less than those which retained them (340 +/- 3 g, K = 1.14 +/- 0.004), irrespective of tagging location or handling treatment. Conclusions Fish tagged in the operculum musculature had comparable rates of mortality and tag loss to the current best practice standard of intraperitoneal tagging. We show that placement of PIT tags in operculum musculature is a viable alternative to placement in the peritoneal cavity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available