4.7 Article

The impact of customer returns in a supply chain with a common retailer

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
Volume 256, Issue 1, Pages 139-150

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2016.06.011

Keywords

Customer returns policy; Game theory; Pricing; Money-back guarantee; Supply chain management

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada [372400]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71102073, 71571102, 71331004, 71171165, 71272128, 71432003]
  3. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20130185110006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Efficient distribution of the product in a supply chain is a critical issue in supply chain management. In the paper, we study a manufacturer Stackelberg supply chain in which a retailer can sell either or both of two brands, a well-known brand and a new brand, in a market supplied by two manufacturers. The two brands are differentiated by customer satisfaction rate. The supply chain involves both vertical competition between the retailer and manufacturers, and horizontal competition between the two manufacturers. We identify the conditions under which the retailer should choose one or both of the two manufacturers, and we show that in certain circumstances, the retailer will prefer to work with both manufacturers, even though one brand of product may have no sales. We find that whether a money-back guarantee (MBG) returns policy should be offered for the supply chain depends only on whether or not the retailer can recover the value of the returned product efficiently, even when the retailer incurs a net cost by accepting returns. We also show that an MBG enhances the profit of the manufacturer with low satisfaction rate, resulting in an increase in both the wholesale price and demand, but it has an opposite impact on the manufacturer with high satisfaction rate. In addition, an MBG enhances the retailer's profit and expands the overall market. Numerical examples are included to illustrate the major results. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available