4.7 Article

A Hybrid Swarm Algorithm for optimizing glaucoma diagnosis

Journal

COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 63, Issue -, Pages 196-207

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.05.018

Keywords

Glaucoma; Hyper analytic wavelet transform; Hybrid PSO-GSO; Feature extraction; Support Vector Machines

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glaucoma is among the most common causes of permanent blindness in human. Because the initial symptoms are not evident, mass screening would assist early diagnosis in the vast population. Such mass screening requires an automated diagnosis technique. Our proposed automation consists of preprocessing, optimal wavelet transformation, feature extraction, and classification modules. The hyper analytic wavelet transformation (HWT) based statistical features are extracted from fundus images. Because HWT preserves phase information, it is appropriate for feature extraction. The features are then classified by a Support Vector Machine (SVM) with a radial basis function (RBF) kernel. The filter coefficients of the wavelet transformation process and the SVM-RB width parameter are simultaneously tailored to best-fit the diagnosis by the hybrid Particle Swarm algorithm. To overcome premature convergence, a Group Search Optimizer (GSO) random searching (ranging) and area scanning behavior (around the optima) are embedded within the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) framework. We also embed a novel potential-area scanning as a preventive mechanism against premature convergence, rather than diagnosis and cure. This embedding does not compromise the generality and utility of PSO. In two 10-fold cross-validated test runs, the diagnostic accuracy of the proposed hybrid PSO exceeded that of conventional PSO. Furthermore, the hybrid PSO maintained the ability to explore even at later iterations, ensuring maturity in fitness. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available