3.8 Article

An Exploratory Mixed Methods Study of Experiences of Interprofessional Teams Who Received Coaching to Simultaneously Redesign Primary Care Education and Clinical Practice

Journal

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/21501327211023716

Keywords

academic interprofessional coaching; interprofessional education; primary care residency training

Funding

  1. American Board of Family Medicine Foundation
  2. American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation
  3. American Board of Pediatrics Foundation
  4. Josiah Macy Jr.
  5. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluated the experiences of interprofessional teams coached by interprofessional coaches to improve primary care residency training and interprofessional practice. Participants reported that coaches helped them develop as teams, stay on task, and respond to local context issues, showing a positive working relationship with their coaches.
Introduction/Objectives: Coaching is emerging as a form of facilitation in health professions education. Most studies focus on one-on-one coaching rather than team coaching. We assessed the experiences of interprofessional teams coached to simultaneously improve primary care residency training and interprofessional practice. Methods: This three-year exploratory mixed methods study included transformational assistance from 9 interprofessional coaches, one assigned to each of 9 interprofessional primary care teams that included family medicine, internal medicine, pediatrics, nursing, pharmacy and behavioral health. Coaches interacted with teams during 2 in-person training sessions, an in-person site visit, and then as requested by their teams. Surveys administered at I year and end study assessed the coaching relationship and process. Results: The majority of participants (82% at end of Year I and 76.6% at end study) agreed or strongly agreed that their coach developed a positive working relationship with their team. Participants indicated coaches helped them: (1) develop as teams, (2) stay on task, and (3) respond to local context issues, with between 54.3% and 69.2% agreeing or strongly agreeing that their coaches were helpful in these areas. Cronbach's alpha for the 15 coaching survey items was 0.965. Challenges included aligning the coach's expertise with the team's needs. Conclusions: While team coaching was well received by interprofessional teams of primary care professionals undertaking educational and clinical redesign, the 3 primary care disciplines have much to learn from each other regarding how to improve inter- and intra-professional collaborative practice among clinicians and staff as well as with interprofessional learners rotating through their outpatient clinics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available