4.6 Article

Phase diagram for hole-doped Kitaev systems on the honeycomb lattice

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 104, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.115108

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. State Key Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [12134020]
  2. NSFC [11974421]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [22016YFA0300504]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In extended Kitaev models on the honeycomb lattice, doping holes into the system results in a rich phase diagram of the t-K-Gamma-Gamma' model, showing the interplay between charge and spin degrees of freedom. Multiple superconducting and pseudogap phases are generated, with a Chern number of the topological superconductor being either v = +/- 2 or v = +/- 1. The presence of an intermediate in-plane magnetic field slightly enlarges the topological superconducting phase.
In extended Kitaev models on the honeycomb lattice, off-diagonal interactions (e.g., the Gamma, Gamma' terms) can give rise to non-Kitaev quantum spin liquids and several magnetically ordered phases. In the present paper, we dope holes to the system and study the resultant t-K-Gamma-Gamma' model using mean-field theory. The interplay between the charge and spin degrees of freedom results in a rich phase diagram Similar to doped cuprates, superconductors, pseudogap phases, Fermi liquid, strange metal and paramagnetic phase are generated. What is different is that, we obtain more than one superconducting phase (including a topological one) and more than one pseudogap phase no matter what the original spin state is. The Chern number of the topological superconductor is either v = +/- 2 or v = +/- 1, depending on the ratio Gamma/vertical bar K vertical bar in the spin channel. We further find that an intermediate in-plane magnetic field can slightly enlarge the size of the topological superconducting phase.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available