4.7 Article

Individualised 177Lu-DOTATATE treatment of neuroendocrine tumours based on kidney dosimetry

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3678-4

Keywords

Lu-177-DOTATATE; Neuroendocrine; Dosimetry; PRRT; Renal function

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council [621-2014-6187]
  2. Swedish Cancer Society
  3. Mrs. Berta Kamprad's Foundation
  4. Gunnar Nilsson's Foundation
  5. Swedish Radiation Safety Authority
  6. Jubilee Clinic Cancer Research Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To present data from an interim analysis of a Phase II trial designed to determine the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of individualising treatment based on renal dosimetry, by giving as many cycles as possible within a maximum renal biologically effective dose (BED). Method Treatment was given with repeated cycles of 7.4 GBq 177Lu-DOTATATE at 8-12-week intervals. Detailed dosimetry was performed in all patients after each cycle using a hybrid method (SPECT + planar imaging). All patients received treatment up to a renal BED of 27 +/- 2 Gy (alpha/beta = 2.6 Gy) (Step 1). Selected patients were offered further treatment up to a renal BED of 40 +/- 2 Gy (Step 2). Renal function was followed by estimation and measurement of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Results Fifty-one patients were included in the present analysis. Among the patients who received treatment as planned, the median number of cycles in Step 1 was 5 (range 3-7), and for those who completed Step 2 it was 7 (range 5-8); 73% were able to receive >4 cycles. Although GFR decreased in most patients after the completion of treatment, no grade 3-4 toxicity was observed. Patients with a reduced baseline GFR seemed to have an increased risk of GFR decline. Five patients received treatment in Step 2, none of whom exhibited a significant reduction in renal function. Conclusions Individualising PRRT using renal dosimetry seems feasible and safe and leads to an increased number of cycles in the majority of patients. The trial will continue as planned.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available