4.2 Article

High-performance wide bandgap perovskite solar cells fabricated in ambient high-humidity conditions

Journal

MATERIALS ADVANCES
Volume 2, Issue 19, Pages 6344-6355

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1ma00432h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. FCT (Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia, I.P.) [UIDB/50025/2020, PTDC/NAN-OPT/28430/2017, PTDC/NAN-OPT/28837/2017, UIDP/50025/2020, SFRH/BD/151095/2021]
  2. SYNERGY, H2020-WIDESPREAD-2020-5, CSA [952169]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/NAN-OPT/28430/2017, PTDC/NAN-OPT/28837/2017, SFRH/BD/151095/2021] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wide bandgap double-halide perovskite absorbers were developed with different bromine content to achieve bandgap values between 1.66 to 1.74 eV, showing high reproducibility and stability in PSCs with a remarkable PCE of 16.4% even under ambient and high humidity conditions.
Lead-halide perovskite solar cells (PSCs) are currently the most promising emergent thin-film photovoltaic technology, having already reached power conversion efficiency (PCE) levels of state-of-the-art wafer-based silicon cells. The class of wide bandgap PSCs has also demonstrated high PCE values, thus becoming highly attractive for top sub-cells in tandem devices constructed with silicon or other types of bottom sub-cells. In this study, wide bandgap double-halide (Cs(0.17)FA(0.83)PbI(3-x)Br(x)) perovskite absorbers were developed with different bromine content, aiming to obtain bandgap values between 1.66 to 1.74 eV, by a glovebox-free (ambient) procedure. Low-cost inorganic materials, i.e. TiO2 and CuSCN, were used for the electron and hole transport layers, respectively. The 1.70 eV bandgap perovskite resulted in the highest reproducibility and stability (>80% initial PCE after 3500 hours) properties of the PSCs, remarkably attaining 16.4% PCE even with ambient and high humidity (similar to 70%) fabrication conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available