4.4 Review

Endoscopic treatment for gastric antral vascular ectasia

Journal

THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN CHRONIC DISEASE
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/20406223211039696

Keywords

argon plasma coagulation; endoscopic band ligation; gastric antral vascular ectasia; radiofrequency ablation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) is an uncommon cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Pharmacotherapy, endoscopy, and surgery are the main treatment options, with endoscopy being the common choice. Different endoscopic approaches, including APC, RFA, and EBL, have varying success rates and recurrence rates. Follow-up endoscopy is important for managing the high recurrence of GAVE after endoscopic treatment.
Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) is one of the uncommon causes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Major treatment of GAVE includes pharmacotherapy, endoscopy, and surgery. The efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy have not been sufficiently confirmed; and surgery is just considered when conservative treatment is ineffective. By comparison, endoscopy is a common treatment option for GAVE. This paper reviews the currently used endoscopic approaches for GAVE, mainly including argon plasma coagulation (APC), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and endoscopic band ligation (EBL). It also summarizes their efficacy and procedure-related adverse events. The endoscopic success rate of APC is 40-100%; however, APC needs several treatment sessions, with a high recurrence rate of 10-78.9%. The endoscopic success rates of RFA and EBL are 90-100% and 77.8-100%, respectively; and their recurrence rates are 21.4-33.3% and 8.3-48.1%, respectively. Hyperplastic gastric polyps and sepsis are major adverse events of APC and RFA; and Mallory-Weiss syndrome is occasionally observed after APC. Adverse events of EBL are rare and mild, such as nausea, vomiting, esophageal or abdominal pain, and hyperplastic polyps. APC is often considered as the first-line choice of endoscopic treatment for GAVE. RFA and EBL have been increasingly used as alternatives in patients with refractory GAVE. A high recurrence of GAVE after endoscopic treatment should be fully recognized and cautiously managed by follow-up endoscopy. In future, a head-to-head comparison of different endoscopic approaches for GAVE is warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available