4.8 Article

Fine-Tuning Aggregation of Nonfullerene Acceptor Enables High-Efficiency Organic Solar Cells

Journal

SMALL STRUCTURES
Volume 2, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/sstr.202100055

Keywords

aggregations; efficiencies; hot solutions; nonfullerene acceptors; organic solar cells; thermal annealing

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51825301, 21734001, 21774097, 52073221]
  2. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the USA. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study systematically investigated the aggregation behaviors of a new nonfullerene acceptor C10-IT4F through hot solution casting and thermal annealing, revealing that processing methods have a significant impact on the performance of OSCs. Excessive aggregation can decrease PCE, while enhancing J-aggregation can lead to higher PCE in OSCs.
Molecular aggregations of electron donor and electron acceptor are significantly important for light absorption, exciton separation, and charge transport, which determine the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of organic solar cells (OSCs). Herein, hot solution (HS) casting and thermal annealing (TA)-dependent aggregation behaviors of a new nonfullerene acceptor (NFA), C10-IT4F, are systematically investigated. Upon the TA treatment, the crystallization of C10-IT4F is largely enhanced, and the active layer forms polyhedron crystals in 100 nm scale. This excessive aggregation prevents the exciton diffusion to DY-A interfaces and increases charge recombination, leads to a moderate PCE of 11%. In contrast, the HS treatment significantly improves the J-aggregation of C10-IT4F, and thus produces a new absorption feature in the near-infrared region. As a result, OSCs processed by the HS method yield a high PCE of 14.2%. The results highlight the effect of processing methods on the molecular aggregation of NFAs and photovoltaic performance of OSCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available