4.5 Article

Prognostic Relevance of Pretreatment Peripheral Neutrophil Count and Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio in Primary Cutaneous Angiosarcoma

Journal

ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA
Volume 101, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACTA DERMATO-VENEREOLOGICA
DOI: 10.2340/00015555-3898

Keywords

cutaneous angiosarcoma; systemic inflammatory response; neutrophil; neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; prognostic factor; overall survival

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that systemic inflammatory response markers are predictive factors for primary cutaneous angiosarcoma, with high neutrophil count and high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio identified as independent poor prognostic factors for overall survival.
Systemic inflammatory response markers, including neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to -lymphocyte ratio and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio, are useful prognostic factors for various malignant tumours. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical relevance of these markers in primary cutaneous angiosarcoma. Twenty-six patients were retrospectively divided into 2 groups according to pretreatment peripheral blood cell counts or systemic inflammatory response marker levels; overall survival and progression-free survival were compared. Univariate analysis found that high neutrophil count (> 3.1x10(9)/l), high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (> 2.4), high platelet to-lymphocyte ratio (> 175) and low lymphocyte count (<= 1.3x10(9)/l) were related to shorter overall survival, while high neutrophil and low lymphocyte groups had shorter progression-free survival. In multivariate analysis, high neutrophil count and high neutrophil-tolymphocyte ratio (hazard ratio 7.44 and 5.04, 95% confidence interval 1.48-37.2 and 1.26-20.1, respectively) were identified as independent prognostic factors for poor overall survival. These results indicate that systemic inflammatory response markers serve as prognostic predictors in primary cutaneous angiosarcoma, as well as in other types of soft-tissue sarcoma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available